Review Procedure

The Current Pharmaceutical Letters And Reviews (CPLR) upholds rigorous standards through a peer review process to ensure the publication of top-tier research that benefits the scientific community at large. Peer review, where fellow experts in the field evaluate the validity and quality of scientific work, is a cornerstone of scholarly publishing.

Upon receiving a new manuscript, the editorial office meticulously assesses several criteria to determine its suitability for publication. These include authenticity, completeness, ethical approval, correct formatting, originality, innovation, significance to the field, alignment with the journal's scope, adherence to scientific writing conventions, and language proficiency. Manuscripts meeting these criteria proceed to publication consideration, while those falling short may face rejection.

CPLR employs a double-blind peer review system, where both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other. Reviewers are tasked with evaluating the manuscript based on predefined criteria such as originality, significance, methodology, analysis, clarity, and international relevance. Their feedback is confidentially shared with the authors, allowing for constructive dialogue and potential improvements..

Once all reviews are gathered, the Editor(s)-in-Chief assess the manuscript's suitability for publication, taking into account the reviewers' comments. If accepted, authors receive guidance on formatting requirements for final submission. Manuscripts requiring revisions must address reviewer feedback and adhere to formatting standards before resubmission. In cases of rejection, the review process concludes.

At CPLR, the peer review process serves as a robust mechanism to uphold scholarly excellence and advance scientific knowledge within the research community.